The expression science has many gitiks. Science Can Do Much Gitik - Focus comes from childhood. Important actions during focus

Function:

As part of this pseudo-statement, it is no coincidence that each letter is repeated twice: it turns out that the expression forms the basis for a card trick.

The word “gitik” supposedly comes from the English GT (Greater Tactics, which means “best strategy”, “cunning technique for winning”). Mnemonic phrases for card tricks began to appear in the second half of the 18th century in France. The first Russian-language card mnemonic “Glory leads to troubles” was invented in 1869 by the poet V. G. Benediktov. In the 1920s, readers of Ya. I. Perelman suggested two other meaningful phrases: “Makar cuts the threads with a knife” and “We buy cereals and tobacco in bulk.” However, more often mnemonics consist of words that are grammatically inconsistent or unrelated in meaning. For example, “lyric ploughshare rahat kutum”.

Computer technology has brought the search for mnemonic expressions, called gitikas, to a qualitatively new level. From the area of ​​card tricks, the problem gradually moved to the area of ​​linguistic combinatorics. Using dictionary search, longer texts with similar properties were found: “Bold blackbirds near pieces of marabou” (30 cards are used), “It is beneficial for departed princes to spoil the burst of revelry” (42 cards). By analogy with phrases for pairs of cards (gitika), there are mnemonics for triplets of cards (tritika). The theoretical foundations of git-creativity are outlined in the article by Andrey Fedorov “The Science of gitik”. The most productive creators of Russian-language gitikas are Viktor Filimonenkov (Russia), Dmitry Chirkazov (Germany), Michael Fuchs (Israel).

Usage

The magician invites the spectator to shuffle the deck and place 10 pairs of cards face down on the table. He asks him to choose any pair and remember both cards. You can even turn away for greater effect. After this, you need to collect all the pairs in turn into one pack and, without shuffling, lay out the cards face up according to the following pattern:

N A U K A U M E E T M N O G O G I T I K

The first two cards are placed in place of the letters “n” (the first letter of the first row and the second letter of the third), the second two are placed in place of the letters “a” (the second and fifth letters of the first row), etc. The magician asks you to name in which rows hidden cards are located. The spectator names the row numbers, after which the magician immediately “finds” the hidden pair using a key phrase. It is easy to notice that each letter appears twice, and for any rows named by the viewer there is only one letter. For example, if the cards are in the second and fourth rows, then this will be the last card in the second and the third in the fourth (they have a common letter “t”). The trick can be performed not only with playing cards, but also with any 20 different objects, for example, dominoes, postage stamps, illustrated postcards, etc.

“Science can do a lot of geeks” in culture

Science can do a lot of geeks

The first time I attended a dissertation defense was in 1972. An employee of our laboratory, Garik, defended himself. And we all, of course, went to the defense.

It was in a small assembly hall of about a hundred people. Members of the Academic Council sat in the front rows. I remember that for some reason the Secretary of the Party Committee was included in the Academic Council, ex officio.

There was a podium with a microphone at the front of the stage. And at the back of the stage, the applicant hung up his numerous posters in advance. Garik went to the podium and began his report.

Comrades, the “Directives of the 24th Congress of the CPSU” indicate the importance of the accelerated development of the electric power industry. In this regard, the tasks of increasing the operating efficiency of steam turbines become of great importance. In this work...

Then he took the pointer and went to his posters. Where he spent about twenty minutes, saying something and pointing a pointer at one poster or another. Although the hall was small, the stage was quite deep, from the microphone to the posters there were six meters. Almost nothing was heard. However, perhaps the dissertation author’s voice could be heard in the first row.

Then Garik returned to the podium and said:

Annual economic effect...etc.

Then there were debates. Then the Academic Council voted. There was only one vote against. And in the evening there was a banquet. I liked it all very much.

From the book Yaroslav Galan author Belyaev Vladimir Pavlovich

A man who does not know how to live in peace The poet Semyon Gudzenko was a soldier. When he had a chance to read what came from the pen of the Wiknovites, and in particular the story of Galan’s friend Alexander Gavrilyuk “Birch,” he had a feeling of discovery, which he wrote about in

From the book Frank Sinatra: Ava Gardner or Marilyn Monroe? The craziest love of the 20th century author Boyadzhieva Lyudmila Grigorievna

“Love knows how to grow old. Love knows how to become a wound” - Please, dear, don’t cry! - Frank put his hand on Nancy's shoulder and shuddered that he might be doing this for the last time. - Don't call me that! You want to destroy the family. You don't care about children. That

From the book How Much is a Person Worth? Notebook one: In Bessarabia author

From the book How Much is a Person Worth? The story of the experience in 12 notebooks and 6 volumes. author Kersnovskaya Evfrosiniya Antonovna

The people know how to destroy. The people, indeed, managed to wipe off from the face of the earth everything that had been created over the years: all the livestock was slaughtered down to the last piglet. Even the cow Vilma was a gold medalist, giving 29 liters of milk per day with a fat content of 4 and even 4.75 percent, - was not

From the book Hohmo sapiens. Notes of a drinking provincial author Glazer Vladimir

SCIENCE CAN DO A LOT OF GITICS Scientific conferences in the USSR were one of the popular types of paid leisure. Many wrote articles for magazines and became co-authors with others only because of possible thoughtless pastime somewhere in Odessa or Tartu. In Rostov

From the book Secrets of a Real Investigation. Notes of the investigator of the prosecutor's office on particularly important cases author Topilskaya Elena

From the book Balzac without a mask by Cyprio Pierre

MUCH GOOD AND MUCH BAD In 1850–1851, the problems of Balzac's creative heritage receded into the background before the threat of a mortgage hanging over the property of Eva Hanska's children in Poland. Five months after Balzac's death, Eva realized that she had rushed in vain

From the book Notes of a Necropolisist. Walks along Novodevichy author Kipnis Solomon Efimovich

DID A LOT OF WORK, EVEN A VERY MUCH WORK Maggo Petr Nikolaevich (1879-1941). For a long time it was impossible to find out who this person was. When I finally found out, the difficulties of the search immediately became clear. Maggo is one of the team of executioners. Simply put - an executioner. Information about

From the book I'm Always Lucky! [Memoirs of a happy woman] author Lifshits Galina Markovna

“He doesn’t know how to build!” On September 1, 1982, my daughter went to first grade. She was happily looking forward to this event. We all do too. The first day is a holiday. We take her home from school. - Well, how? Did you like it? “Yes, everyone lies there,” the daughter sighs in disappointment. Well, the fact that they lie - and

From the book The Adventures of Another Boy. Autism and more author Zavarzina-Mammy Elizaveta

How to check if a child can read Start with the simplest, for example, ask the child to show what he wants, juice or milk, offer to choose a picture or toy, one letter or word from several written on separate pieces of paper. More difficult task -

From the book Strange Cities Are Noisy Here, or the Great Experiment of Negative Selection author Nosik Boris Mikhailovich

Many, many wonderful years Returning to France in 1948, Chagall settled first in Orgeval, then on the Cote d'Azur in France. It was there that the sixty-five-year-old artist met his new wife, a native of Kyiv Valentina Brodskaya (Baby in the family), with whom he

From the book Stubborn Classic. Collected Poems (1889–1934) author Shestakov Dmitry Petrovich

From the book “I will live until old age, until glory...”. Boris Kornilov author Berggolts Olga Fedorovna

28. “Sorry! Be happy for many, many years...” “Sorry! Be happy for many, many years." So a traveler in the twilight of an Alpine gorge Sings; for a moment one will enrich the joy of the difficult road, and for whom does he sing? He sings to his dear, friendly friend, But the song will only be touched by a faint sound.

From the author's book

From the author's book

106. “How many, many of them - withered late roses...” How many, many of them, withered, late roses, Tired ghosts of the faded past... How many, many of them in the dusk of the dusk, Unspoken words, unshed tears... They fly, glide with all ends of the earth, like gray shadows,

From the author's book

“I want life - a lot, a lot...” Diary of O. F. Berggolts: 1928–1930 Publication by N. A. Prozorova The published diary of Olga Fedorovna Berggolts (1910–1975) is dedicated to the beginning of her poetic path, the literary life of Leningrad in the late 1920s years, personal and creative

The expression “science has many tricks” was once coined to demonstrate a trick with playing cards, but has long become a catchphrase. In some cases, it may mean that science knows a lot that we have not yet heard about, in others - that there is no need to look for meaning where there is none...


The sacred meaning of the profession of “scientist”

I once wanted to become a scientist. I wanted it for a long time, probably ten years, although I was brutally disappointed at the university...
And one should not think that this was facilitated by some difficulties in studying or failures in exams - on the contrary, it all started with success.
From this:

Then there were several more of the same, but that’s not the point. The works took up only a few pages (the first, in my opinion, three, including one for the introduction) and even had some potential national economic significance. Well, in short, some properties of matrices were introduced there, which were preserved under certain transformations of these matrices having such properties (well, say, when applying some algorithms for solving systems of linear equations). The immediate benefit of preserving the described properties was that it was possible, for example, to calculate in advance the calculation error when using a particular method (and at the same time check its applicability, because if the error exceeded the result, then it would be pointless to use this method). By the way, at the same time it turned out that in some real problems there were precisely matrices that had the described property, and the calculated error for the algorithms with which these systems of equations were solved by real engineers exceeded the results, which made the calculations of the latter absolutely meaningless. And there is no need to say what economists do with their huge systems of equations. The error in calculations there sometimes exceeds the result by orders of magnitude, since it accumulates depending on the dimension of the system.

However, do you think this led to anything? It didn't lead to anything! An attempt to explain the essence of the problem to engineers or economists failed (they simply did not understand anything), and meaningless calculations may continue to this day...

And then I realized that science is, in principle, such a very intimate jerk-off for narrow specialists and you can only do it if you get personal sexual satisfaction from the results. Well, there are, of course, such pop results that are quickly implemented in life or, on the contrary, for which life has been waiting for a long time, but there are no scientists who could obtain the expected results. But all these are isolated cases, and 99.9% of all scientific “achievements” go to the table (that is, the efficiency here is even lower than that of writers with graphomaniacs). Of course, scientists also have their own sinecures for regular milking and/or the opportunity to satisfy their own curiosity at the expense of others, but this is already in the realm of “working for food,” and not out of a spiritual vocation.

At the same time, with my youthful maximalism, it was somehow offensive to realize the uselessness of my activities for others. Well, like, those for whom it was intended had neither the strength nor the desire to understand anything, and those who were able to understand treated it as a not very funny joke (I watched it and forgot). Moreover, to get a result, I struggled with the task for two months, and then anyone who could understand its meaning only needed to look at the page with the results. Well, for everyone else, all this was simply incomprehensible and unnecessary (even to those for whom the result could seriously help).

In general, this cognitive dissonance finished me off, causing an indelible feeling of psychological discomfort.

At the dots, poor little ones,
There are no arms or legs.
I don’t understand how they
Do they mesh in a straight line?
(J. A. Lindon, trans. A. Glebovskaya)

And I remembered this for this reason. I was recently solving a school problem on occasion and along the way I identified a new family or class of triangles.
These are triangles in which the straight line passing through the centers of the inscribed and circumscribed circles is parallel to one of the sides.
And what, in my opinion, such triangles are no worse than any “equilateral”, “isosceles” or “rectangular” ones and may well lay claim to a special family - they have the property to determine their “nationality”! And I even came up with a formula for it.

A triangle whose straight line passing through the centers of the inscribed and circumscribed circles is parallel to one of the sides must have the following angle:


Where R and r are, respectively, the centers of the circumcircle and inscribed circle.

The angle calculated by this formula will lie opposite the side parallel to which the straight line drawn through the centers of the inscribed and circumscribed circles will pass.

I suggest calling them " triangles Kolobok", and the formula - " Kolobok's formula".

Ask why such triangles are needed? “First of all, it’s beautiful...” Humanity loves to classify everything according to some properties! Here's another property for classification.
And secondly, using this formula you can solve some problems.

For example, like this:

A triangle is drawn, it is known that its angles are 58, 59 and 63 degrees, but it is not known where which one is. Two points are given - one is the center of the circumscribed circle, the other is the center of the inscribed circle, but it is not known what is at which point.
There is only a one-sided ruler without divisions. Indicate all the angles and determine where the centers of the circles are.

PS.
By the way, humanity has, for example, a seemingly very simple problem that it (humanity) has not been able to solve for several thousand years.
There are natural numbers that are called “perfect”. They are defined as follows: “perfect” is a natural number equal to the sum of all its own divisors (i.e., all positive divisors other than the number itself). As natural numbers increase, perfect numbers become less common.
So, odd perfect numbers have not yet been discovered, but it has not been proven that they do not exist. It is also unknown whether the set of all perfect numbers is infinite or finite.
And there is no formula for finding perfect numbers, there is only an algorithm for finding them, described by Euclid...

In the meantime, mathematics is powerless, religion rules with perfect numbers.

In his essay “The City of God,” St. Augustine wrote:

"The number 6 is perfect in itself, and not because the Lord created all things in 6 days; rather, on the contrary, God created all things in 6 days because this number is perfect. And it would remain perfect even if there was no creation in 6 days."

So the perfect beauty and complete uselessness of perfect numbers is the best characteristic of all science as such...

The word "gitik" is a combination of letters that has no ordinary semantic meaning (or goes back to the German gütig, meaning: good, graceful) and is not used outside of this expression. Mnemonic phrases for card tricks began to appear in the second half of the 18th century in France. The first Russian-language card mnemonic “Glory leads to troubles” was invented in 1869 by the poet V. G. Benediktov. In the 1920s, readers of Ya. I. Perelman suggested two other meaningful phrases: “Makar cuts the threads with a knife” and “We buy cereals and tobacco in bulk.” However, more often mnemonics consist of words that are grammatically inconsistent or unrelated in meaning. For example, “lyric ploughshare rahat kutum”.

Computer technology has brought the search for mnemonic expressions, called gitikas, to a qualitatively new level. From the area of ​​card tricks, the problem gradually moved to the area of ​​linguistic combinatorics. Using dictionary search, longer texts with similar properties were found: “Bold blackbirds near pieces of marabou” (30 cards are used), “It is beneficial for departed princes to spoil the burst of revelry” (42 cards). By analogy with phrases for pairs of cards (gitika), there are mnemonics for triplets of cards (tritika). The theoretical foundations of git-creativity are outlined in the article by Andrey Fedorov “The Science of gitik”. The most productive creators of Russian-language gitikas are Viktor Filimonenkov (Russia), Dmitry Chirkazov (Germany), Michael Fuchs (Israel).

Encyclopedic YouTube

    1 / 5

    EASY CARD Tricks THAT WILL SURPRISE EVERYONE!

    The first stories of life. Part 2.

    Gitik The inner world of man and the 3rd World War

    Geopolitics from the Almighty.

    Emergency version of the story

    Subtitles

    Hi all! You are on the YouFact channel and today I will show you 3 card tricks with guessing the card of your interlocutor. 1. In the first trick we will try to predict one of the three cards that the interlocutor will choose. We lay out 3 cards in front of him and give him the right to choose one of them. He chooses, for example, the ace of spades, and we show him our prediction. And we see that the prediction turned out to be correct. Now let's see the secret of this trick, it is very simple. If the interlocutor chooses the ace of spades, then, as you have already seen, we show him the back of the box from under the deck with our prediction. If he chooses the seven of hearts, then we show him a box of matches with a fortune for the seven. And if he chooses the king of diamonds, then we will open the box and take out a piece of paper with a prepared prediction for the king. As you can see, we have prepared all 3 predictions for each case, but the interlocutor does not know this. 2. In the next trick, we take 21 cards, fan them out and tell our interlocutor to choose one of them and remember. After that, we lay out our cards into 3 decks. At this time, your interlocutor should monitor your actions and notice which of the three decks his card ended up in. He says his card is in the left deck. We take this deck, place it in the center and cover it with the right deck on top. Then we turn the cards over and lay them out again. After we have laid it out, the interlocutor points to the deck with his card for the second time, we fold them again, making sure to put the deck with the card in the middle, and lay them out a third time. The interlocutor points to the desired deck for the last time, we put it in the middle again, turn the cards over and begin to randomly scatter them across the floor. When all the cards are scattered, let the interlocutor try to pull out his own card. Of course, he won't be able to do this. And you take it and easily pull out the hidden card from this pile. To do this, you need to strictly follow the rules and be sure to place the deck with the hidden card in the middle. At the very end, when you scatter the cards, be sure to count out the 11th card, it will be the card that your interlocutor wished for. 3. And in the last trick we take a whole deck of cards and fan them out. The interlocutor thinks of a card, for example, the seven of the cross and gives it to you. You put the card back in the deck and start having a good time with it. After a thorough shuffle, you fan out the cards again and try to guess the other person's card. Gradually, you discard those cards that you think do not contain the hidden card. After you have discarded all unnecessary cards, you only have in your hands the card your interlocutor wished for. The secret of this trick is also very simple. As you can see, the backs of all cards are facing the same direction. And when your interlocutor chooses one of them, you take it and turn it over so that the shirt faces the other way. Thus, after any shuffling, you can easily find the hidden card on the upside down shirt.

Usage

The magician invites the spectator to shuffle the deck and place 10 pairs of cards face down on the table. He asks him to choose any pair and remember both cards. You can even turn away for greater effect. After this, you need to collect all the pairs in turn into one pack and, without shuffling, lay out the cards face up according to the following pattern:

N A U K A U M E E T M N O G O G I T I K

The first two cards are placed in place of the letters “n” (the first letter of the first row and the second letter of the third), the second two are placed in place of the letters “a” (the second and fifth letters of the first row), etc. The magician asks you to name in which rows hidden cards are located. The spectator names the row numbers, after which the magician immediately “finds” the hidden pair using a key phrase. It is easy to notice that each letter appears twice. For example, if the cards are in the second and fourth rows, then this will be the last card in the second and the third in the fourth (they have a common letter “t”). The trick can be performed not only with playing cards, but also with any 20 different objects, for example, dominoes, postage stamps, illustrated postcards, etc.

“Science can do a lot of geeks” in culture

The first use of the mnemonic “Science can do many things” as a catchphrase was recorded in 1900 in the correspondence of A. P. Chekhov with P. A. Sergeenko. The first use in a literary work was E. I. Zamyatin’s story “On the Middle East” (1914). There, for the first time, a traditional mistake was noted - “has” instead of “can”.

In some cases, a catchphrase may mean that science knows a lot that we have not yet heard of (cf.: “There are many things in the world, friend Horatio, that our sages never dreamed of” W. Shakespeare, Hamlet). In others - that there is no need to look for meaning where there is none (since the word “gitik” has no meaning). Finally, this phrase can be used as a request not to say words whose meaning is unknown to the speaker.

Annushka told us a long time ago that “science can do a lot of geeks.” This was the secret formula for one card trick. The cards were laid out in pairs according to the same letters, and the hidden pair was easily found. It followed from this that science was truly omnipotent and could do a lot of... this very thing... gitik... No one knew what “gitik” was. We looked for explanations in the encyclopedic dictionary, but there, after the mercenary Turkish cavalry “Gitas”, it was immediately followed by “Gito” - the killer of the American President Garfield. And there was no git between them.

Another characteristic use of the phrase can be found in the novel by A. and B. Strugatsky “The Doomed City”:

“I see,” said Andrey. - May I know from what sources you got this information? - he asked Izya.
“Everything is the same, my soul,” said Izya. - History is a great science. And in our city she can do a lot of guitars.

Who knows! - Dauge looked slyly at the shocked driver. - Science, as you know, can do a lot of tricks. And compared to ten thousand years, twenty seems like a moment!

... (Just don’t throw up your hands in bewilderment and roll your eyes: science, as a form of human imagination, can, of course, do a lot of tricks, but nature can do countless times more of these tricks.)

In cinema, the phrase “Science has many goals” is used in the television series “Kamenskaya” (season 5, episode 4). Here it is used as a key value that defines the ultimate goal of the series.